Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
HON’BLE MR. SHEO KUMAR SINGH, J, HON’BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, E
M/s Tirupati Minerals, Through its proprietor Subham Dinesh Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. environmental compensation controversy. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. arguments on hearing and procedural compliance. (Para 2 , 7) |
| 3. court's review of procedural fairness. (Para 3 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. legal norms for environmental compensation. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 5. principles of natural justice articulated. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. natural justice as a flexible principle. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. implications of non-observance of natural justice. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. no automatic nullification from breaches of natural justice. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 9. reflection on the advancement of natural justice principles. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 10. prejudice assessment in natural justice. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 11. judging the necessity of natural justice provisions. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 12. principles governing procedural violations. (Para 32 , 33) |
| 13. significance of admitted facts in justice. (Para 34 , 35) |
| 14. (Para 36 , 37) |
| 15. dismissal of the appeal. (Para 38) |
JUDGMENT
1. The Appellant has preferred the instant appeal against the impugned order dated 13.09.2024 passed by the Appellate Authority, Environment Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh, and the order dated 06.02.2023 issued by the office of Respondent
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
