Back
ORISSA HIGH COURT
S.K. SAHOO, C. R. Dash, JJ
Jyotirmayee Dutta – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge against the evaluation process in ojs examination. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments addressing the legitimacy of re-evaluation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. establishing issues of non-evaluation and resultant administrative procedure. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's directive on procedural fairness and integrity. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. court’s dismissal of the writ and awarded compensation for identified flaws. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
Chittaranjan Dash, J.
1. Heard Mr. Srinivas Mohanty, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, Mr. Debasish Nayak, learned Additional Government Advocate and Mr. P. K. Mohanty, learned Senior Advocate representing Opposite Party No.2 i.e. Odisha Public Service Commission.
2. By means of this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of the evaluation process in the Written Examination, Odisha Judicial Service Examination (OJS), 2022 and prays for evaluation of the left-out answer script by OPSC in the law of Property in Q-5(a) and in other questions as per the guidelines provided under the scheme of evaluation.
3. The background facts of the case are that the Petitioner appeared for the OJS Main Exam 2022 under PPSAN
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
