SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 3114

ORISSA HIGH COURT
S.K. SAHOO, J
Priyam Pratham Sabat – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. A. Behera
For the Respondents: Mr. Jateswar Nayak

ORDER

Order No. 22.08.2025

01. This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

This is an application for bail under section 439 of Cr.P.C. in connection with Digapahandi P.S. Case No.232 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.287 of 2025 pending in the file of learned J.M.F.C., Signature Not Verified Digitaly Signed Signed by: SIPUN BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Digapahandi for alleged commission of offences under Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 22-Aug-2025 17:05:15 sections 316(5)/318(4) of BNS.

The prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by the learned Presiding Officer, OPID -cum- Addl. Sessions Judge, Berhampur vide order dated

09.07.2025.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 26.06.2025 and he was the Branch staff of Union Bank of India, Digapahandi Branch and though the allegation has been labeled against him that he has misappropriated a sum of Rs.70 lakhs, but he has already deposited the said amount in the Bank. Learned counsel further submits that since the of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top