Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
BIBEK CHAUDHURI, J
Snehi Kumari – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, General Administration Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of writ petitions (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the petitioners' candidature (Para 4 , 6 , 9) |
| 3. petitioner's contentions on reservation violation (Para 7 , 12) |
| 4. bpsc's counterarguments and legal basis (Para 10 , 34) |
| 5. legal interpretation of horizontal reservation (Para 33 , 68 , 106) |
| 6. disposition of writ petitions with directions (Para 111) |
CAV JUDGMENT
Date : 07.02.2025
1. These batch of writ petitions having similar set of questions of law and fact have been heard together and this court proceeds to deliver the following judgment to dispose of aforementioned writ petitions by a composite judgment
2. In all the aforementioned writ petitions the petitioners appeared for selection and appointment the post of assistant engineer (civil) on the basis of an advertisement bearing number 2 of 2017 issued by Bihar Public Service Commission on 3rd march 2017, which was subsequently amended by another notification having same advertisement number dated 6th February 2019, whereby and where under the number of posts were increased by the BPSC in consultation with the concerned department of the state government.
3. There are certain factual differences in respect of in th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
