SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3293

PATNA HIGH COURT
Arun Kumar Jha, J
Radhe Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Prabhas Yadav – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Suman Kumar Mishra

CAV JUDGMENT

Date : 26-06-2024

The present civil misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 02.03.2017 passed by the learned Munsif-I, Munger in Misc. Case No. 05 of 2016 rejecting the petition dated 21.05.2016 filed by the petitioner for review of the order dated 22.04.2016 passed in Title Suit No. 23 of 2011 and also for quashing the order dated 22.04.2016 passed in Title Suit No. 23 of 2011 whereby and whereunder the petitioner was debarred from cross-examining the witness Prabhas Yadav, the respondent herein, on the point of contents of document.

02. Briefly stated, the facts leading to filing of the present petitioner, as it appears from the record, are that the petitioner has filed Title Suit No. 23 of 2011 for declaration of the title of the plaintiff on the suit land and for confirmation of possession over the said property apart from recovery of possession in case the plaintiff was dispossessed during pendency of the suit and also for permanent injunction against the defendant. After service of notice, the respondent, who is defendant before the learned trial court, appeared and filed his written

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top