SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 1391

PATNA HIGH COURT
JITENDRA KUMAR, J
Laxmi Devi @ Suman Devi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Indradeo Prasad
For the Respondents: Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare

ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 23-09-2025

The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 03.09.2024, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bagaha, West Champaran in Complaint Case No. 1038-C of 2023, whereby learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of offence punishable under Sections 323 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code against only one accused namely, Pankaj Tiwari who is Respondent No. 2 herein. The criminal complaint bearing No. 1038-C of 2023 was filed by the petitioner herein against 23 accused persons including the Private Respondents herein for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 119 , 143, 147, 166, 167, 207, 209, 217, 218, 219, 220, 228, 120B, 323, 448, 504 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code . However, by the impugned order, learned Magistrate has taken cognizance only against one accused, namely, Pankaj Tiwary, who is Respondent No. 2 herein, for the offence punishable only under Sections 323 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code .

2. The present revision petition is at the stage of admission.

3. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State on the point of admission.

4. Learned counsel for the petitione

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top