Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
JITENDRA KUMAR, J
Laxmi Devi @ Suman Devi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner and defendants' details in complaint. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's argument regarding the exclusion of accused. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's consideration of revision maintainability. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. interpretation of interlocutory vs intermediate orders. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. determining nature of impugned order. (Para 18 , 22) |
| 6. conclusion: petition dismissed as non-maintainable. (Para 23 , 24) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 23-09-2025
The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 03.09.2024, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bagaha, West Champaran in Complaint Case No. 1038-C of 2023, whereby learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of offence punishable under Sections 323 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code against only one accused namely, Pankaj Tiwari who is Respondent No. 2 herein. The criminal complaint bearing No. 1038-C of 2023 was filed by the petitioner herein against 23 accused persons including the Private Respondents herein for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 119 , 143, 147, 166, 167, 207, 209, 217, 218, 219, 220, 228, 120B, 323, 448, 504 and 511 of the Indian
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
