Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
A. ABHISHEK REDDY, J
Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund Organization – Appellant
Versus
M/S Urmila Info Solutions – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's relief request details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding improper procedures. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. clarification of statutory provisions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. mandatory interest for delayed contributions. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. conditions for imposing penalties. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. remand for fresh orders under section 14b. (Para 16 , 17) |
CAV JUDGMENT
Date : 07-05-2025
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present Writ Petition has been filled for the following reliefs:-
“(i) For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the order dated 28-03-2023 passed by the learned Central Government Industrial Tribunal-2, Dhanbad (hereinafter to be referred as CGIT only) in IT No. 2/9/2022 whereby the learned Tribunal has allowed the appeal preferred by the respondent against two separate orders passed under section 14B and 7Q and has directed to refund the entire amount of Rs. 1,02,18,489/- to the respondent.
(ii) For holding that the order dated 28-03- 2023 passed by the learned CGIT-II, Dhanbad is against the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in CWJC No. 10921/2022 whereby the matter was remanded to the Tribunal with an observation that no appe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
