Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
HARISH KUMAR, J
Satyendra Narayan Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. description of accusation and procedural background. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. contentions regarding procedural fairness and violation of rights. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. analysis of charges of corruption and judicial review scope. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. importance of evidence and procedural fairness in disciplinary hearings. (Para 24 , 26 , 28) |
| 5. conclusion and implications of dismissal. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
JUDGMENT
Date : 01-08-2025
This Court has heard Ms. Nivedita Nirvikar, learned Senior Advocate with Ms. Shashipriya, learned Advocate for the petitioner. The State is represented through Mr. Bipin Kumar, learned Advocate. Mr. Anil Singh, learned Advocate appears for the Vigilance Investigation Bureau.
2. The challenge made in the present writ petition is the order contained in Memo No. 5824 dated 10.10.2018 issued under the signature of the respondent no. 2, the Joint Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, whereby the petitioner has been dismissed from service. The grievance has also been raised that the petitioner has not even been extended the subsistence allowance during the period of suspension for the period with effect f
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
