Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
BIBEK CHAUDHURI, DR. ANSHUMAN, JJ
Mohd Phool Sharif @ Phool Sharif – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and appellants. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the prosecution case and investigation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. witness testimonies supporting the abduction claim. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. medical examination and evidence regarding victim's condition. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. conclusion of prosecution evidence. (Para 18) |
| 6. arguments presented by the appellants' counsel. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. discussion of case law supporting appellants' arguments. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 8. critique of evidence and procedural shortcomings. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 9. court’s analysis and reasoning. (Para 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 10. final verdict on admissibility of evidence. (Para 36) |
| 11. outcome of the judgment and release notice. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 12. acknowledgment of amicus curiae's contributions. (Para 42) |
CAV JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN)
Date : 16-12-2025
Heard Mr. Udit Nr. Singh, learned counsel assisted by Mr. Dhananjay Mishra and Mr. Nilesh Kumar Nirala, learned Advocate in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 347 of 2017; Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel assisted by Ms. Vaishnavi Singh, Mr. Ritwik Thakur, and M
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
