SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 94

PATNA HIGH COURT
Nani Tagia, Sunil Dutta Mishra, JJ
Vishal Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Nandita – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant/s: Mr. Rajani Kant Mishra
For the Respondent/s: Ms. Sakshi Bhatnagar

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA C.A.V. JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA)

Date : 06-02-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for appellant as well as the learned counsel for respondent.

2. The present appeal has been filed under Section

19 of the Family Courts Act , 1984 by the appellant for setting aside the order dated 05.01.2017 and decree dated 19.01.2017 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali at Hajipur (hereinafter referred to as ‘Family Court’) in Divorce Case No. 263 of 2016 whereby and whereunder the Divorce Petition filed by the respondent-wife was allowed ex-parte and the marriage of the appellant with the respondent was dissolved.

3. The facts of the case, in brief, is that the marriage between the appellant-husband and the respondent- wife was solemnized on 08.02.2012 at Mumbai in accordance with Hindu rites and customs. The marriage was a love marriage, the parties having come into contact while pursuing their studies at Melbourne, Australia, and was later solemnized with the consent of their respective families. After marriage, the parties resided together as husband and wife and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top