IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI
Mahesh Mahato – Appellant
Versus
Shibani Mahato, Wife of Mahesh Mahato – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the matrimonial dispute (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments of the appellant regarding evidence (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. defenses presented by respondent (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. court's interpretation of cruelty (Para 22 , 23 , 28 , 35 , 36) |
| 5. concept and interpretation of desertion (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 6. court's conclusion on claims of desertion (Para 68 , 69 , 70) |
| 7. dismissing the appeal with no merit (Para 79 , 80) |
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
1. The instant appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 is directed against the order/judgment dated 23.06.2023 (decree signed on 04.07.2023) passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Seraikella Kharsawan in Original Suit No. 55 of 2021, whereby and whereunder, the said Suit filed by the appellant-husband under the provisions of Sections 13(1), (i) & (i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955against his wife has been dismissed.
2. The brief facts of the case as per the original matrimonial suit and the pleading made in the instant appeal needs to be referred hereinwhich reads under:
This suit had been filed by the appellant/petitioner for a decree of div
Dr. N.G. Dastane Vs. Mrs. S. Dastane
Shobha Rani Vs. Madhukar Reddi
V. Bhagat vs. D. Bhagat (Mrs.)
Vijay Kumar Ramchandra Bhate v. Neela Vijay Kumar Bhate
Sujata Uday Patil v. Uday Madhukar Patil
Joydeep Majumdar v. Bharti Jaiswal Majumdar
Vidhya Viswanathan v. Kartik Balakrishnan
Debananda Tamuli vs. Kakumoni Kataky
Lachman Utamchand Kirpalani v. Meena
Arulvelu and Anr. vs. State [Represented by the Public Prosecutor] and Anr.
Grounds for divorce under Hindu Marriage Act must be substantiated by convincing evidence; mere allegations of cruelty or adultery without proof do not warrant decree of divorce.
The court ruled that claims of cruelty and desertion must be substantiated with credible evidence, emphasizing that allegations alone are insufficient for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Husband failed to prove cruelty or desertion in divorce suit; unproved illicit relationship allegation itself constitutes cruelty to wife; appellate court upholds trial findings absent perversity, re....
Divorce on cruelty and desertion grounds requires cogent evidence proving grave conduct and animus deserendi; appellate court upholds trial dismissal absent perversity in reasoned findings based on p....
Divorce grounds of adultery require high probability proof beyond suspicion; cruelty must be grave causing cohabitation impossibility; desertion needs two-year separation preceding petition. Absent p....
The burden of proof lies with the appellant to establish claims of cruelty and desertion, which must be supported by credible evidence, and mere allegations without proof are insufficient for divorce....
The appeal court found the Family Court's dismissal of divorce due to cruelty and desertion to be perverse, establishing that the husband's behavior justified dissolution of marriage.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.