SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 273

PATNA HIGH COURT
ANIL KUMAR SINHA, J
Madhurendra Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Chairman cum Managing Director, Bihar State Power (Holding) Co. Ltd. – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 314 of 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Umesh Prasad Singh, Sr. Adv., Mr.Vaibhava Veer Shanker, Mr. Sameer Sawarn
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Dharmeshwar Mishra, Sr. Adv., Mr, Indrajeet Bhushan

Departmental proceedings initiated by an incompetent authority are null and void, requiring adherence to statutory delegation for valid charges and actions.

Headnote:(A) Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 132 and 133 - Departmental proceedings - Initiation by an authority not competent to act leads to vitiation of proceedings - The General Manager (HR & Administration) lacked the jurisdiction to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner, who was not charged with any misconduct as per the findings of the enquiry officer. (Paras 41-43)

(B) Jurisdiction - Competent authority - The initiatory memo of charges not approved by the appointing authority renders the proceeding non est. The Supreme Court affirms that charge sheets must be validated by competent authorities as per statutory rules. (Paras 39-40)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a former employee of a power distribution company, challenged the validity of departmental proceedings initiated against him for alleged negligence, citing the initiation's lack of authority since it was led by someone not designated as the appointing or disciplinary authority.

Findings of Court:
The Court found that the initiation of proceedings lacked jurisdiction, no charges of financial misconduct were proven, and all related resolutions were quashed.

Issues: Whether the disciplinary proceedings were initiated by the appropriate authority and whether the charges against the petitioner were established.

Ratio Decidendi: The initiation of disciplinary proceedings was void as it was conducted by an authority without proper jurisdiction, reinforcing the need for adherence to statutory delegation of powers.

Result: Writ application allowed; all impugned orders quashed.

Table of Content
1. transition of employment due to restructuring (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. disciplinary actions initiated against petitioner (Para 12 , 14)
3. petitioner's arguments on authority and jurisdiction (Para 17 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 28)
4. respondents' case regarding procedure and fairness (Para 25 , 26 , 27)
5. court's examination of jurisdiction in proceedings (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
6. invalidity of proceedings due to lack of authority (Para 40 , 41 , 42)
7. final judgment quashing prior resolutions (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46)

JUDGMENT AND ORDER C.A.V.

Date : 06-01-2026

The present writ application has been filed for quashing the resolution, dated 12.08.2014, issued, by the General Manager (HR & Administration), South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Patna, under Memo No. 1530, whereby departmental proceedings were initiated against the petitioner and for quashing the resolution/Order No. 664, dated 13.05.2016, by which the punishment of withholding two annual increments with cumulative effect was imposed against the petitioner. The petitioner has further prayed for quashing resolution no. 267, dated 14.02.2017, whereby the earlier punishment was modified to the extent of withholding of one annual increment with non- cumulative effect, as well as for quashing the letter no. 647, dated 22.09.2022, whereby the petitioner was informed that his review application has been rejected.

2. The factual matrix of the case of the petitioner, in brief, is that he was initially appointed as Junior Electrical Engineer, vide Notification No. 1097, dated 12.11.1999, issued by the Joint Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board (hereinafter referred as ‘BSEB’). Subsequently, he was promoted to the post of Assistant Electrical Engineer on 17.09.2007. Thereafter, the petitioner was transferred from the Electric Supply Sub-Division, Katihar (Urban) to the Electric Supply Sub-Division, Rajgir with effect from 25.10.2012. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner joined at Rajgir as Assistant Electrical Engineer.

3. With the enactment of the Electricity Act, 2003 , the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 stood repealed and by virtue of Section 172 thereof, the BSEB ceased to exist. In exercise of powers under Section 132 of the , the State Government issued a Notification, dated 30.10.2012, restructuring the erstwhile BSEB into the Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited (in short, ‘BSPHCL’) and its four subsidiary companies, including the South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited (in short, ‘SBPDCL’).

4. In terms of Section 133 of the Electricity Act, 2003 , the services of all employees of the erstwhile BSEB were initially transferred to BSPHCL on the same terms and conditions and thereafter, in accordance with the said notification, employees were allocated to the respective subsidiary companies.

5. Clause 6 of the Notification deals with transfer of persons and Schedule F deals with detailed scheme including the terms and conditions for transfer of the employees in transmission, generation, distribution and common services. The petitioner, being posted at Rajgir, which is a distribution division, became an employee of the SBPDCL with effect from 01.11.2012.

6. The SBPDCL is governed by its Board of Directors, one of whom is the Managing Director (MD), who functions as the Chief Executive and Administrative Head of the Company and thereby became the employer of the petitioner in place of the BSEB. The field undertakings of the company are headed by the General Manager -cum- Chief Engineer.

7. Prior to the posting of the petitioner at Rajgir on 25.10.2012, a tender for appointment of a franchisee for collection of electricity charges/bills from consumers was issued by the erstwhile BSEB. Pursuant thereto, M/s Mithilesh Enterprises was selected as the franchisee and a Letter of Intent, under Memo No. 3281, dated 28.08.2012, was issued by the Electrical Superintending Engineer, Biharsharif.

8. In terms of Clause 4 of the Letter of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top