SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 281

PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Bibek Chaudhuri, J
Dr. Shyam Kumar Satyapal – Appellant
Versus
The National Medical Commission – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11111 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Ms. Shrishti Singh, Advocate, Mr. Pranav Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Saurabh Sunder, Advocate, Mr. Ashish Gaurav, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. P.K. Sahi, AG, Mr. P.N. Sharma, AC to AG
For the NMC:Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan, Sr.S.C, Mr. Sudarshan Bharadwaj, Advocate
For the UOI: Dr. K.N. Singh, ASG, Mr. Amit Kishore Sinha, CGC

Mandatory Aadhar-based facial recognition attendance is unconstitutional as it violates the right to privacy under Articles 14, 19, and 21 and must be voluntary as per the Aadhar Act.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, and 21 - Aadhar Act - Sections 7, 8, 23, 53, and 57 - Right to Privacy - Challenge to mandatory face-based Aadhar identification and GPS location attendance by medical faculty - Court emphasizes that Aadhar authentication must be voluntary and restricted to defined welfare purposes. The implementation by NMC is viewed as a potential violation of privacy rights and dignity of medical professionals. The court dismissed the petition stating, 'this Court does not find any merit in the instant writ petition.' (Paras 1, 11, 24, 39, 43)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, medical faculty members, challenged a public notice mandating face-based Aadhar authentication for attendance, claiming it violated their right to privacy as established in the K.S. Puttaswamy judgments.

Findings of Court:
The court found no substantiated case of fundamental rights violation by the biometric attendance system and emphasized the NMC's statutory mandate to improve faculty attendance.

Issues: Main questions related to the legality and constitutionality of mandatory face-based Aadhar authentication for attendance tracking and its correlation with privacy rights.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed that mandatory Aadhar-based attendance metrics fail to meet the proportionality test of privacy rights under constitutional law, defining the need for voluntary consent.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to government's attendance policy. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. aadhar act provisions on authentication. (Para 5 , 6 , 10)
3. right to privacy as a constitutional issue. (Para 11 , 12 , 19)
4. inadequate justification for privacy violation. (Para 25 , 39)
5. dismissal of petition with directions for future action. (Para 43 , 44 , 46)

CAV JUDGMENT

Date: 17-01-2026

1. A constitutional issue of violation of Right to Privacy is the bone of contention of the instant writ petition, where some medical practitioners, who are in employment in different Medical Colleges and Hospitals in the State of Bihar, have challenged the public notice, dated 17th of April, 2025, issued under the signature of the Secretary, National Medical Commission, whereby face based Aadhar Identification and sharing of GPS location for marking attendance of faculty members of the medical colleges has been directed to be mandatorily implemented in all medical colleges/institutions. The petitioners have also prayed for quashing subsequent orders bearing Memo No. 1128 of 2025, dated 21st of April, 2025 issued under the signature of the Member, Sri Krishna Medical College, Muzaffarpur and the letter bearing no. 414 (17) dated 30th of April, 2025, whereby and whereunder, all the departmental heads have been directed for implementation of notice, dated 16th of April, 2025.

2. For the sake of brevity, this Court finds it appropriate, at the outset, to set out the prayers / reliefs prayed by the petitioners in the instant writ petition:

“i. To issue an appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) in the nature of certiorari for quashing the public notice dated 16.04.2025 issued under the signature of the Secretary, National Medical Commission, whereby the FACE based Aadhar authentication and sharing of Global Positioning System (GPS) for marking attendance of faculty has been directed for mandatory implementation in all medical colleges/institutions (Annexure-P/1, Pg.28.).

ii. To issue an appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) in the nature of certiorari for quashing the office order bearing memo no. 1128/25 dated 21.04.2025 issued under the signature of Principal, Sri Krishna Medical College & Hospital, Muzaffarpur, whereby all the Departmental Heads have been directed for implementation of FACE based Aadhar authentication for marking attendance of doctors / faculty doctors through Face Biometric authentication from 01.05.2025. (Annexure-P/2, Pg. 45).

iii. To issue an appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) in the nature of certiorari for quashing the letter bearing no. 414(17) dated 30.04.2025 issued under the signature of Officer on Special Duty, Health Department, whereby pursuant to the notice of the NMC dated 16.04.2025, the Principals / Superintendents of all the Government Medical Colleges and Hospitals in the state of Bihar have been directed to mandatorily implement the FACE based Aadhar authentication for marking attendance of doctors / faculty doctors (Annexure-P/3, Pg.46.).

iv. To issue an appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to implement the FACE based Aadhar authentication for marking attendance of doctors/faculty doctors. v. To issue an appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to delete all data collected pursuant to the public notice dated 16.04.2025.

vi. To any other relief(s) that the petitioners are entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

3. The case of the petitioners is that they are faculty members being Assistant Officers, Professor and Heads of the Department, Associate Professor in Sri Krishna Medical College and Hospital, Muzaffarpur; Jawahar Lal Nahru Medical College and Hospital, Bhagalpur; Government College, Bettiah; Nalanda Medical College and Hospital; Government Medical College, Purnia; Darbhanga Medical College and Hospital and Government Medical College, Purnia, respectively.

4. They ar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top