Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. ALOK KUMAR PANDEY, J
Nanhak Rai – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on trial court's ruling. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. arguments against conviction. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's evaluation of evidence. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. critique of witness testimonies. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. establishing burden of proof for abetment. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. requirement of mens rea for abetment. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. judgment annulled due to lack of evidence. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT
Date : 22-12-2025
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The present appeal has been directed against the judgment of conviction dated 31.07.2025 and order of sentence dated 12.08.2025 passed by learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-III, Rohtas at Sasaram in Sessions Trial No. 260 of 2024, arising out of Chenari P.S. Case No. 189 of 2023 whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three years and six months along with fine of Rs. 5,000/- under the said section. In case of default of payment of fine, appellant has to undergo further si
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
