Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Alok Kumar Sinha, J
Kumari Bandana and Anr – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of petitioners’ appointments. (Para 3) |
| 2. petitioners argue lack of review power. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 9) |
| 3. respondents justify authority's actions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. identification of key legal issues. (Para 13) |
| 5. rules don’t grant review power. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. historical context of review powers. (Para 19 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. court's finding on jurisdiction. (Para 26 , 27 , 29) |
| 8. final ruling and directives. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
CAV JUDGMENT
Date: 23-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. The present writ application has been filed for the following reliefs:
i. For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the Order dated 24.08.2017 passed in Appeal No. 83 of 2017 passed by the learned State Appellate Authority, Bihar, Patna whereby the Appeal preferred by the Petitioners have been rejected on baseless grounds which were never in issue without application of judicious mind.
ii. For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the Order dated 25.01.2016 passed by the Member, District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Buxar in Case N
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
