PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. SANDEEP KUMAR, J
M/s Hollyhock Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar through The Principal Secretary Department of Mines and Geology – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by the petitioner. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. response and arguments from the respondents. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. court’s observations on procedural fairness. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 5. conclusion and directions for remand. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
C.A.V. JUDGMENT
Date : 11-12-2025
Heard Mr. Abhinav Shrivastava, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the State and Mr. Naresh Dikshit, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the Mining Department.
2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for the following reliefs:
(i) To hold and declare that, in the terms of advt. dated 04/03/2024 (Annexure P/1) and / or bid documents, (viz financial bid/technical bid), it was not obligatory for the single bidder / Petitioner, to make at least one call (bid), above the minimum reserve price, and to raise the minimum reserve (bid) price at least by 10% of the minimum reserve price in case of single bidder, as this would be contrary to the fundamental concept of minimum reserve price, in the auction process;
(ii) To issue an appro


Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.