Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
KHATIM REZA, J
State of Bihar through the Collector of the District Bhagalpur – Appellant
Versus
Shailendra Kumar Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case details of land purchase and claims established. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 2. court’s observations equate evidence requirements for establishing ownership. (Para 8 , 10) |
| 3. revenue entries do not equate to title ownership, need for legal documentation. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. limitation assessed from the challenge of ownership, not just recorded entries. (Para 13 , 14) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA CAV ORDER
10 22-12-2025 Heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar Chandram, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and Mr. Syed Qaisar Hasan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
2. The present Second Appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 28.03.2019 passed by the learned 2nd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur in Title Appeal No. 160 of 2018 whereby the judgment and decree dated 25.09.2018 passed by the learned Munsif-II (Sadar), Bhagalpur in Title Suit No. 91 of 2017 has been reversed.
3. In the instant Second Appeal, the defendant is the appellant.
4. The plaintiff-respondent filed Title Suit No. 91 of
2017 against the State of Bihar for declaration of his right, title and interest over the suit land and further prayed that if the Cou
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
