Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Partha Sarthy, J
Bishwanath Pd. Sinha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar and Ors. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. sequence of disciplinary actions and their validity under departmental guidelines. (Para 4) |
| 2. importance of fair procedures and presenting evidence in disciplinary hearings. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. administrative procedural requirements for disciplinary proceedings. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER
7 18-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner who was at the relevant time posted as an Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Sinkandra in Jamui was proceeded against under departmental proceeding which ended in an order of punishment dated 13.2.2009 (Annexure-14) being passed on the orders of the Governor issued under the signature of the Deputy Secretary, Water Resources Department, Bihar imposing the punishment of stoppage of one increment with cumulative effect and further the petitioner would not be entitled for any other amount for the period of suspension, except for the subsistence allowance.
3. Subsequently order dated 8.6.2010 (Annexure-17)
was passed by the Deputy Secretary, Water Resources Department stating that as the order of punishment date
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
