PATNA HIGH COURT
SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA, J
Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER
3 09-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The present petition has been filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to O.P. Nos. 2 to 10, vide order dated 08.07.2024 passed in A.B.P. No. 787 of 2024, arising out of Supaul P.S. Case No. 264 of 2024, by the learned District &
Sessions Judge, Supaul.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Court has granted bail to the accused persons on the irrelevant document. Accordingly, bail of O.P. Nos. 2 to 10 may be cancelled. In support of his contention, he relied on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of Myakala Dharmarajam & Ors. vs. the State of Telangana &
Ors. reported in (2020) 2 SCC 743
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State submits that bail was granted to O.P. Nos. 2 to 10 on merit and no valid ground is made out by the petitioner to cancel their bail at this stage. He further submits that mere perusal of the impugned order, it appears that there is land dispute between the parties and the informant and accused persons have compromised the matter. The informant/ Uma Kant Kumar also appeared
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.