SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 5755

PATNA HIGH COURT
SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA, J
Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Kuldeep Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

3 09-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The present petition has been filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to O.P. Nos. 2 to 10, vide order dated 08.07.2024 passed in A.B.P. No. 787 of 2024, arising out of Supaul P.S. Case No. 264 of 2024, by the learned District &

Sessions Judge, Supaul.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Court has granted bail to the accused persons on the irrelevant document. Accordingly, bail of O.P. Nos. 2 to 10 may be cancelled. In support of his contention, he relied on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of Myakala Dharmarajam & Ors. vs. the State of Telangana &

Ors. reported in (2020) 2 SCC 743

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State submits that bail was granted to O.P. Nos. 2 to 10 on merit and no valid ground is made out by the petitioner to cancel their bail at this stage. He further submits that mere perusal of the impugned order, it appears that there is land dispute between the parties and the informant and accused persons have compromised the matter. The informant/ Uma Kant Kumar also appeared

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top