SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
PARVEEN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. – Respondent


RFA No.5203 of 2010 (O&M)

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

RFA No.5203 of 2010 (O&M)

Date of Decision : 10.08.2011

Parveen Kumar

....Appellant

Versus

The State of Haryana and another

....Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG

1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment ?

2. To be referred to reporters or not ?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?

***

Present:

Mr. Bhag Singh, Advocate

for the appellant.

Mr. Ashok Jindal, AAG Haryana.

* * *

RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL)

This appeal has been filed challenging the award dated 29th

August, 2009 along with an application for condonation of delay in filing

this appeal. On 24th February, 2011, the following order was passed by this

Court:-

“A perusal of the paper book shows that respondent No.1

has been impleaded by merely mentioning “The State of

Haryana” without stating that through whom the service is to

be effected or which is the contesting department.

This is an appeal arising out of an award of the learned

court below pertaining to acquisition of land, whereby a bunch

of 152 references was decided. A perusal of the judgment

sho

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top