HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
PARVEEN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. – Respondent
RFA No.5203 of 2010 (O&M)
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.5203 of 2010 (O&M)
Date of Decision : 10.08.2011
Parveen Kumar
....Appellant
Versus
The State of Haryana and another
....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment ?
2. To be referred to reporters or not ?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?
***
Present:
Mr. Bhag Singh, Advocate
for the appellant.
Mr. Ashok Jindal, AAG Haryana.
* * *
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL)
This appeal has been filed challenging the award dated 29th
August, 2009 along with an application for condonation of delay in filing
this appeal. On 24th February, 2011, the following order was passed by this
Court:-
“A perusal of the paper book shows that respondent No.1
has been impleaded by merely mentioning “The State of
Haryana” without stating that through whom the service is to
be effected or which is the contesting department.
This is an appeal arising out of an award of the learned
court below pertaining to acquisition of land, whereby a bunch
of 152 references was decided. A perusal of the judgment
sho
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.