SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SUMEET GOEL, J
Dhan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ramu & others – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ravi Malik
For the Respondents:

SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)

CRM-16561-2018

1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant- petitioner seeking condonation of delay of 331 days in filing the accompanying revision petition. The main revision petition has been filed impugning the judgment dated 21.12.2016, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Palwal dismissing the appeal preferred by the applicant- petitioner against the judgment and order of conviction dated 28.04.2016/02.05.2016 of the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Hodal whereby respondent Nos.1 & 2 (herein) were convicted for the offences under Sections 323 and 324 read with Section 34 IPC and were acquitted of the offence under Section 326 IPC. The applicant-petitioner, by way of instant revision petition, impugns the abovesaid two judgments to the extent of acquitting the respondent Nos.1 & 2 for offence punishable under Section 326 IPC.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant-petitioner, while seeking grant of prayer for condonation of delay of 331 days, has argued that the delay has occurred on account of the applicant-petitioner’s poverty and his consequent inability to arrange the funds for filing the instant revision petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top