Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J
SHASHI JAIN – Appellant
Versus
BABY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for preponing the hearing date. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. complainant as 'victim' entitled to appeal. (Para 3) |
| 3. procedural flexibility to serve justice. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. order to dispose of the application. (Para 8) |
SURYA PARTAP SINGH . J.(Oral)
CRM-39123-2025 This is an application for preponing the date of hearing of the main case which is stated to be fixed for 14.01.2026.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the date of hearing in the present appeal is hereby preponed from 14.01.2026 to today itself i.e. 30.09.2025.
Main case
1. The applicant has filed the present application seeking for leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal, passed in a complaint case instituted under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as ‘NI Act’), whereby, a complaint filed by the applicant was dismissed and the accused acquitted.
2. The limited question arising for consideration in the present proceedings is whether an appeal against a judgment of acquittal passed by the Court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Samalkha in a complaint case, with regard to commission of offence punishable under Sect
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
