SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3928

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PARMOD GOYAL, J
TILAK RAJ – Appellant
Versus
DES RAJ KAINTH – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Mandeep Singh Sachdev
For the Respondents:

Table of Content
1. landlord asserts eviction due to non-payment of rent. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court evaluates evidence presented by landlord and tenant. (Para 5 , 6)
3. jurisdiction under rent act established despite naming inaccuracies. (Para 7 , 11)
4. final ruling rejects the revision petition based on substantive evidence. (Para 12)

Parmod Goyal, J.

Petitioner (hereinafter referred as petitioner/tenant) is aggrieved by order dated 10.09.2025, passed by learned Appellate Authority, Jalandhar vide which appeal, against order of the learned Rent Controller, Jalandhar dated 28.07.2022, wherein eviction petition of landlord was allowed and respondent/tenant was directed to hand over the vacant possession within three months, was dismissed.

2. Respondent (hereinafter referred as respondent/landlord) in his petition for eviction asserted that suit property was purchased by his mother to the extent of 16 ½ marlas vide registered sale deed dated 04.08.1980. Similarly, his father had also purchased 16 ½ marlas of suit property vide sale deed dated 01.08.1980. The property was shared by father and mother of petitioner and they raised construction of house over property measuring 33 marlas. The house

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top