IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PARMOD GOYAL, J
TILAK RAJ – Appellant
Versus
DES RAJ KAINTH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. landlord asserts eviction due to non-payment of rent. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court evaluates evidence presented by landlord and tenant. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. jurisdiction under rent act established despite naming inaccuracies. (Para 7 , 11) |
| 4. final ruling rejects the revision petition based on substantive evidence. (Para 12) |
Parmod Goyal, J.
Petitioner (hereinafter referred as petitioner/tenant) is aggrieved by order dated 10.09.2025, passed by learned Appellate Authority, Jalandhar vide which appeal, against order of the learned Rent Controller, Jalandhar dated 28.07.2022, wherein eviction petition of landlord was allowed and respondent/tenant was directed to hand over the vacant possession within three months, was dismissed.
2. Respondent (hereinafter referred as respondent/landlord) in his petition for eviction asserted that suit property was purchased by his mother to the extent of 16 ½ marlas vide registered sale deed dated 04.08.1980. Similarly, his father had also purchased 16 ½ marlas of suit property vide sale deed dated 01.08.1980. The property was shared by father and mother of petitioner and they raised construction of house over property measuring 33 marlas. The house
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.