Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J
Suman Lata and Others – Appellant
Versus
Ravinder Kumar and Others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court applies article 227 and dismisses the civil revision petition. (Para 1 , 5 , 10) |
| 2. the injunction against co-sharers is generally impermissible. (Para 2 , 4 , 8) |
| 3. plaintiffs' claim of exclusive ownership not supported legally against joint co-ownership. (Para 3 , 9) |
AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J.
1. The present civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting-aside the impugned order dated 22.07.2025 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Jind in CIS (CMA) No.33/2025 titled as ‘Ravinder Kumar and Another Versus Suman Lata and Others’ (Annexure P-7) whereby the learned ADJ Kaithal has set aside the interim order dated 23.05.2025 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Jind in civil Suit No.339 of 2025, which is illegal, void, arbitrary.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs instituted a suit for permanent injunction claiming that they were owners in exclusive possession of the banquet hall situated at Village Kishanpura, District Jind, on the basis of Jamabandi entries and municipal records. They alleged that the defendants, who have no concern with the property,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
