SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 5835

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(O&M) MAKTULO – Appellant
Versus
RAM PARKASH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on 31st of October, 2025 Pronounced on 12th of November, 2025 Uploaded on 12th of November, 2025 RSA-1279-1991 (O&M)

Maktulo (Deceased) through LRs and others ....Appellants Versus Ram Parkash (deceased) through LRs and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Vijay K. Jindal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Shukla, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anmol Rattan Singh Dhillon, Advocate, Mr. Vishal Pundir, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Ashwani K. Chopra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harminder Singh, Advocate and Ms. Ridhima Khindria, Advocate for respondent No.2.

PANKAJ JAIN, J.

Plaintiffs are in appeal. For convenience and to avoid confusion, the parties hereinafter are referred to as by their original position before the Court of the First Instance, i.e., the appellants as ‘plaintiffs’ and the respondents as ‘defendants’.

2. The plaintiffs filed suit seeking decree of declaration to the effect that they are owners in possession of a land measuring 69 Kanals and DEEPAK KUMAR

17 Marlas as detailed out in the headnote of the plaint and that order of partition d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top