SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 109

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JAI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
PRITHVI RAJ – Respondent


PW3/C), situated within the municipal limits of Jhajjar, vide a registered sale deed dated 11.06.1985 (Ex.PW3/A), from its previous owners, namely Sushila Mehta and Krishana Chawla, daughters of Inderjeet Mehta. The boundaries of the said land, as reflected in the sale deed, are as under:

- East: House of Dina Ram – 24 feet

- West: Public road (sare-aam) – 24 feet

- North: Closed street / pathway – 59 feet

- South: Closed street / pathway and house of Dalal – 59 feet

3.2 It is further pleaded that after obtaining approval of the site plan from the Municipal Committee on 24.01.1986, the plaintiff raised construction of a residential house over the said land. He opened doors, ventilators, and outlets for discharge of water towards a street measuring 10 feet in width, situated on the southern side of his house, shown by letters ‘CDEF’ in red colour in the site plan (Ex.PW3/C). According to the plaintiff, water supply and sewerage connections were also provided towards the said southern street.

3.3 The grievance of the plaintiff is that defendant No.1—the Municipal Committee, Jhajjar (now proforma respondent No.2), illegally sold the aforesaid street to defendant No.2, Jai Singh (appellant h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top