SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 845

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUDESH @ SUDESH KUMARI – Appellant
Versus
HARDEEP SINGH @ HARDIP SINGH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

1. CR-472-2026(O&M)

Reserved on :-21.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement:-28.01.2026 Uploaded on:-29.1.2026 Sudesh @ Sudesh Kumari … Petitioner Versus Hardeep Singh @ Hardip Singh ... Respondent

2. CR-556-2026 (O&M)

Sudesh @ Sudesh Kumari … Petitioner Versus Hardeep Singh @ Hardip Singh ... Respondent ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Argued by :-

Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner(s) (through Video Conferencing).

Mr. Mayur Singla, Advocate for the caveator/respondent(s).

****

1. This consolidated order is rendered for the adjudication of the above-captioned Civil Revisions (hereinafter referred to as “CRs”), each arising from an identical factual and legal matrix. In view of the commonality of parties, the coextensive nature of the impugned orders, and the consent of learned counsels for their joint consideration, the CRs are being disposed of collectively in the interests of judicial economy, consistency in legal interpretation, and procedural efficiency.

2. At the instance of learned counsel for the parties in both CRs, the factual matrix has been meticulously extracted from the records of both matters, as it p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top