ALKA SARIN
Kewal Krishan – Appellant
Versus
Paras Mahajan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Alka Sarin, J. (Oral)
The challenge in the present revision petition is to the orders of ejectment passed against the tenant-petitioner. The Rent Controller, vide order dated 19.04.2022, ordered the tenant-petitioner to be evicted on his failure to pay the assessed rent. Aggrieved by the same, an appeal was preferred which was also dismissed by the Appellate Authority vide order dated 28.04.2023.
2. The brief facts relevant to the present lis are that the provisional rent was assessed by the Rent Controller vide order dated 21.03.2022 in the presence of both the counsel for the parties and after hearing them. Para 3 of the said order reads as under :
The failure of a tenant to comply with a Rent Controller's order for provisional rent assessment necessitates eviction, as the Controller has no jurisdiction to extend the payment period.
A tenant's failure to deposit assessed provisional rent mandates eviction under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1976.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Rent Controller has no jurisdiction to extend the period for tendering the provisionally assessed arrears of rent, and failure to comply w....
Court confirms that a tenant's good faith intent to pay addresses eviction liability if the Rent Controller fails to accurately assess due rent, emphasizing fair enforcement of the law.
The tenant is obligated to make timely payments of arrears of rent as determined by the Rent Controller/Appellate Authority, and failure to do so can lead to eviction.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.