1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-1332-2011 (O&M)

KAUSHALYA DEVI ..Appellant Versus ROSHAN LAL ..Respondents Reserved on: 29.01.2026 Date of decision: 30.01.2026 Uploaded on: 31.01.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Dheeraj Narula, Advocate for the appellant.

None for respondent No.2 and 3.

Mr. Rajneesh Malhotra, Advocate for respondent No.4-Insurance Company.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 02.04.2010 passed in the claim petition filed under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sirsa (for short, 'the Tribunal') for enhancement of compensation granted to the claimant/appellant on account of injuries suffered by him in a Motor Vehicular accident, occurred on 07.03.2006, whereby the claimant/appellant was granted compensation to the tune of Rs.59,178/-.

2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal, a detailed narration of the facts of the case