SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 17456

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Anoop Chitkara, J
Varun Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
CRM-M-6886-2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: B.S. Bhalla
For the Respondents: Sourabh Goel, Deify Jindal

In cases involving commercial quantities of contraband under the NDPS Act, bail cannot be granted unless the twin conditions under Section 37 are met, establishing reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and is unlikely to commit further offences, particularly where the accused has criminal antecedents.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 37 - Anticipatory Bail - Commercial quantity - Petitioner involved in a network trafficking psychotropic medicines - Twin conditions of S. 37 must be satisfied - Burden of proof is on the petitioner to show non-involvement - Disclosure statements and call records establish prima facie connection - Previous criminal antecedents under NDPS Act - Anticipatory bail denied. (Paras 11, 12, 17, 24, 27)

(B) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Custodial interrogation - Vital for unearthing network - Judiciary must act judiciously in considering criminal history of recidivist. (Paras 7, 26)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, allegedly a main supplier of Alprazolam and Tramadol, filed an anticipatory bail application after co-accused disclosures linked him to the seized commercial quantity. The petitioner has prior criminal cases registered under the NDPS Act.

Findings of Court:
The court found that because the quantity of contraband involved is commercial, the stringent requirements of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are attracted. The evidentiary material, including call records and disclosure statements, establishes sufficient prima facie evidence of the petitioner's involvement, failing to satisfy the twin conditions for bail.

Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail for an offence involving a commercial quantity of psychotropic substances under the NDPS Act, given the evidence of his role and prior criminal antecedents.

Ratio Decidendi: When dealing with a commercial quantity of contraband under the NDPS Act, the court cannot grant bail unless the twin conditions of Section 37 are met, which require reasonable grounds for believing the accused is not guilty and is unlikely to commit further offences.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. procedural context and case background of the bail application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. summary of competing arguments regarding custodial interrogation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. requirement of satisfying twin conditions for commercial quantity under section 37 ndps act. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. evidence analysis concerning disclosure statements and call record connectivity. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. precedent application regarding criminal antecedents and bail grant criteria. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
6. final orders and safety safeguards during custodial interrogation. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)

****

ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

NCB Case No. Dated Police Station Sections
51 08.12.2024 Narcotic Control Bureau, Amritsar Zone Unit 8/22/29 of NDPS Act

1. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the case captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking anticipatory bail.

2. Per paragraph 13 of the bail petition, the petitioner has the following criminal antecedents:

Sr. No. FIR No. Date/year Offenses Police Station
1 46 2022 22/29/61/85 of NDPS Act Maqboolpura, District Amritsar
2 85 2023 22/25/27/29/61/85 of NDPS Act Valtoha, District Tarn Taran

3. The facts and allegations are taken from the complaint filed by the NCB. On 08.12.2024, based on secret information, the Police seized 35120 tablets of Alprazolam and 1220 tablets of Tramadol from the possession of co-accused Sukhpal Singh and Harvinder Singh @ Padda. The Investigator claims to have complied with all the statutory requirements of the NDPS Act, 1985, and the BNSS 2023.

4. During the investigation, Sukhpal Singh disclosed the name of one Sonu Singh, from whom 11400 tablets of tramadol and 9600 tablets of Alprazolam were recovered. Co-accused Sonu disclosed that he had been receiving deliveries from Varun Kumar (present petitioner) and his associate Harish. Based on this statement, the petitioner was arraigned as the accused in this case. Further Harish was arrested and he named the petitioner as main supplier.

5. The petitioner's counsel prays for bail by imposing any stringent conditions and contends that further pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and their family.

6. The NCB counsel opposes bail and refers to the reply.

7. It would be appropriate to refer to the following portions of the reply, which read as follows:

“5.That, total 7 accused have been arrested till date in the present case which clearly indicates involvement of a whole network involved in trafficking of psychotropic medicine and two accused out of seven disclosed the active involvement of Varun Kumar( the petitioner) in the said case, therefore, presence of petitioner during investigation is vital to unearth the whole network of psychotropic medicine market which possibly can further lead to the recovery of some more psychotropic medicines and other narcotics contrabands and arrest of some other influential persons who are supporting the entire gang. The custodial interrogation of Varun Kumar(the petitioner) is very much required for breaking entire nexus of trafficking of above psychotropic medicines and other narcotics contraband.

6. That as per the information available through the investigation till now, the petitioner is one of main supplier and the member of the network of psychotropic medicine market involved in trafficking of psychotropic medicine. It is also pertinent to mention that petitioner has criminal history as two FIR in NDPS ACT had also been lodged against him in past, FIR No. 46/2022 PS Maqbool Pura, CP Amritsar u/s 22,29,61 & 85 of NDPS, Act and FIR No. 85/2023 PS Valtoha, TarnTaran u/s 22,25, 27, 29, 61 & 85 of NDPS, Act.”

REASONING:

8. In the nutshell, the investigation points out that the main accused is Sukhpal Singh, from whose possession the Narcotics Control Bureau had recovered a massive quantity

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top