Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.H. KAPADIA, CJI., A.K. PATNAIK, SWATANTER KUMAR, JJ.
National Campaign Committee for Central Legislation on Construction Labour - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and Others - Respondent
IA No. 6 in WP (C) No. 318 of 2000 with Contempt Petitions (C) Nos. 41, 44 and 42 of 2011 in WP (C) No. 318 of 2006 and Contempt Petition (C) No. 43 of 2011
Decided on : 28-11-2011
ORDER :
S.H. Kapadia, CJI.
Since almost every State is in contempt, we have no option but to take further steps in the matter.
2. However, in order to give opportunity to the States, the matter is being adjourned to the last week of December, 2011, to enable each defaulting State to file its reply as to why contempt action should not be taken against the officers concerned.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
