SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 569

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
LOVLEEN SETHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

Reserved on 08.10.2025 Pronounced on 12.11.2025 ****

Lovleen Sethi ... Petitioner VS.

State Bank of India & Ors. ... Respondents ****

CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL ****

Present: Ms. Sangeeta Dhanda, Advocate and Mr. Anirudh Dhanda, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Madhu Dayal, Advocate for the respondents ****

Sandeep Moudgil, J.

(1). The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, for issuing a writ of certiorari for quashing the orders dated 12.12.2018 (Annexure P5), 17.12.2018 (Annexure P6), 18.12.2018 (Annexure P7) and 04.12.2018 (Annexure P7A) vide which promotion granted to him has been ordered to be withdrawn besides recovery of perquisites and allowances. He seeks a direction restraining the respondents from effecting recovery and to continue paying full salary to the petitioner. Also, a direction is sought to the respondents to promote the petitioner as per promotion policy dated 04.04.2014 (Annexure P1) from the date of his eligibility taking into consideration the fact that the similarly situated and batchmate officers of the petitioner have already been pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top