SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 27683

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH XXXXX ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents Sr. No. Particulars Details 1 The date when the judgment is reserved 23.03.2026 2 The date when the judgment is pronounced 30.03.2026 3 The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website 30.03.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or full

4 Full judgment is pronounced The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full judgment, and Not

5 reasons thereof applicable CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Advocate with Mr. Naveen Nandal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Neeraj Poswal, A.A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Sanjeev Majra, Advocate for respondent No.2.

***

MANISHA BATRA, J :-

The petitioner is challenging the order dated 22.09.2025 passed by the learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Panipat in case arising out of FIR No. 419 dated 27.06.2025, registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’) and Section 3 of the Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short ‘SC/ST Act’) at Police Station Chandni Bagh, Panipat, whereby

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top