IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH XXXXX ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents Sr. No. Particulars Details 1 The date when the judgment is reserved 23.03.2026 2 The date when the judgment is pronounced 30.03.2026 3 The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website 30.03.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or full
4 Full judgment is pronounced The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full judgment, and Not
5 reasons thereof applicable CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Advocate with Mr. Naveen Nandal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Neeraj Poswal, A.A.G., Haryana.
Mr. Sanjeev Majra, Advocate for respondent No.2.
***
MANISHA BATRA, J :-
The petitioner is challenging the order dated 22.09.2025 passed by the learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Panipat in case arising out of FIR No. 419 dated 27.06.2025, registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’) and Section 3 of the Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short ‘SC/ST Act’) at Police Station Chandni Bagh, Panipat, whereby
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.