SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


lived there for 10 days. When her brother was coming to meet her, they told her to ask him to bring motor cycle. When she told them that he was unable to purchase Bullet motorcycle being a labourer, her father-in-law said that he was a Government employee, earning Rs.50,000/- and many rich families were still inquiring about his son for marriage. Her mother-in-law Gurdevan Bai, brother-in-law Baj Singh started thrashing her. Her husband caught hold of her head and banged it on the wall. Her sister-in-law (Jethani) also thrashed her. When she fell down unconscious, they called her brother telephonically conveying that she was ill. When he reached, he found her lying unconscious in the courtyard and took her to Civil Hospital, Gurharsahai for treatment where her medico-legal report was prepared.

Legal action was prayed for.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner No.1 was the elder sister-in-law (Jethani) and petitioner No.2 was the brother-in- law (Jeth) of respondent No.2 who were married many years before marriage of the complainant and were residing separately. Their names were dragged in the FIR only to harass them. There was no specific allegation of any dem

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top