ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for declaring the acquisition proceedings to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act of 2013’).

2. Briefly the facts relevant to the present lis are that on 14.04.1974 a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act of 1894’) was issued. Declaration under Section 6 of the Act of 1894 was issued on 10.02.1976. The award was passed on 21.10.1976. Thereafter, possession was taken vide rapat roznamcha No.76 dated 21.10.1976.

3. Initially, the present writ petition was allowed vide order dated 27.11.2017. Aggrieved by the same the respondents herein filed an appeal before the Supreme Court. The said Civil Appeal along with the other connected Civil Appeals as also the case titled as State of Haryana & Ors. vs. Aalamgir & Ors. [(2025) 6 SCC 397], being the lead case, was allowed and the matter was remanded back to this Court for reconsidering the issues in view of the Constitution Bench judgment in the case of Indore Development Authority vs. ManoharLal & Ors. [(2020) 8 SCC 129 = 2020 (4) RCR (Civil) 668]

4. As per the written statement dated 16.08.2017 filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2, in Clause D and E, it has been stated as under :

“(D) Status of payment of compensation

That as per record, total amount of compensation of awarded land measuring 15.38 acres of village Sihi was Rs.251331/ out of which an amount of Rs.244373/- has been disbursed to the land owners, which is 97.23%. The balance amount of Rs.6,958/- in respect of which the landowners did not come forward to receive the payment, is lying deposited in the Land Acquisition Collector's common account. As far as the petitioners are concerned, it is submitted that the petitioners are recorded as Gair moursi over the land in question and the petitioners have not received the payment amounting to Rs.12306/ including the payment of land, house and trees and plants. The payment of land is amounting to Rs.6958 plus Payment of house amounting to Rs-5048/- plus payment of trees and plants amounting to Rs 300/- (6958+5048+300=12306).

(E) Status of Possession:

That as per record, the award of the acquired land in question was announced on 21.10.1976 vide award no.4 and the possession of the said land was taken and handed over to HUDA on 21.10.1976 vide rapat no.76.”

5. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and have carefully gone through the records.

6. Their Lordships in the case of Indore Development Authority (supra) held as under :

“366. In view of the aforesaid discussion, we answer the questions as under:

366.1. Under the provisions of Section 24(1)(a) in case the award is not made as on 1-1-2014, the date of commencement of the 2013 Act, there is no lapse of proceedings. Compensation has to be determined under the provisions of the 2013 Act.

366.2. In case the award has been passed within the window period of five years excluding the period covered by an interim order of the court, then proceedings shall continue as provided under Section 24(1)(b) of the 2013 Act under the 1894 Act as if it has not been repealed.

366.3. The word “or” used in Section 24(2) between possession and compensation has to be read as “nor” or as “and”. The deemed lapse of land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act takes place where due to inaction of authorities for five years or more prior to commencement of the said Act, the possession of land has not been taken nor compensation has been paid. In other words, in case possession has been taken, compensation has not been paid then there is no lapse. Similarly, if compensation has been paid, possession has not been taken then there is no lapse.

366.4. The expression “paid” in the ma