Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Harsimran Singh Sethi, Yashvir Singh Rathor, JJ
Usha Rani – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. failure to produce data to challenge election processes in a writ petition warrants non-interference. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. court hands-off policy regarding active election processes where intervention would delay the scheduled election. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
* * *
Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral)
1. In the present petition, the challenge is to the various actions performed by the State of Haryana with regard to the Municipal Corporation, Panchkula, which includes the delimitation of the wards of Municipal Corporation, Panchkula; reserving of wards for the members belonging to the scheduled castes category as well as various other actions taken by the Government qua the Municipal Corporation, Panchkula.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though vide notification dated 15.01.2026 (Annexure P-27) issued by the Government of Haryana, certain wards being wards No.07,16 & 17 were reserved for the members of the scheduled castes category but nothing has come on record to show that out of all the wards of the Municipal Corporation Panchkula, the said wards have the maximum popula
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
