SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S. A. BOBDE, CJI., B.R. GAVAI, SURYA KANT, JJ.
DRAVIDA MUNNETRA KAZHAGAM (DMK) – APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
SECRETARY GOVERNORS SECRETARIAT AND ORS. – RESPONDENT(S)
IA No. 182868/2019 in CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 54675469/2017 WITH M.A. No.2328/2019 in W.P.(C) No.1267/2018 (With IA No. 183503/2019 and IA No. 183515/2019 and IA No. 163332/2019 and IA No. 183506/2019 and I.A. Nos.186721 and 186722 of 2019 and I.A. No.185943 of 2019) WITH Contempt Petition (C) Diary No(s).38969/2019 in W.P.(C) No.1267/2018 WITH W.P.(C) No.1411/2019 (IA No.183815/2019, IA No.185955/2019, IA No.183813/2019) WITH W.P.(C) No.1415/2019 WITH W.P.(C) No.1413/2019 (I.A. No. 183819/2019) WITH W.P.(C) No.1418/2019 WITH W.P.(C) No. 1417/2019 (IA No.185986/2019 and IA No.185985/2019) WITH W.P.(C) No. 1420/2019 (IA No.185976/2019 and IA No.185974/2019) AND Writ Petition (C) Diary No.43683 of 2019
Decided On : 06-12-2019
Tamil Nadu Delimitation Commission Act, 2017 – Constitution of India – Articles 243-O and 243-ZG – Delimitation of constituencies – As per Article 243B, Panchayats have to mandatorily be constituted in a State at village, intermediate and district levels – Each Panchayat must be divided into territorial constituencies and per Article 243D, seats in proportion to their population must be reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in each Panchayat – Constitutional object of Part IX cannot be effectively achieved unless delimitation exercise for constitution of local bodies at all levels is properly undertaken – Such exercise in State of Tamil Nadu must keep in view criteria for delimitation of wards prescribed under Tamil Nadu Local Bodies Delimitation Regulations, 2017 (formulated under Tamil Nadu Delimitation Commission Act, 2017), which criteria must itself not be contrary to Article 243C read with Article 243B(1) of Constitution – There is no identified data elucidating population proportions and requisite reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes cannot be provided for, both in re village Panchayat wards or Chairman/Vice-Chairman of District bodies – Election process as notified by State Election Commission on 2nd December, 2019, in respect of newly constituted nine districts cannot be held unless fresh delimitation exercise in respect thereto is first completed – Since respondents have already used 2011 Census while conducting latest delimitation exercise (except in newly reconstituted nine districts), these appeals have been rendered infructuous and disposed of accordingly. (Paras 11, 12, 13 and 17)
Facts of the case:
Instant Interlocutory Applications have been filed seeking directions for compliance with Constitutional mandate concerning elections to local bodies. The lead applicant, Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), is appellant in the Civil Appeal Nos. 54675469 of 2017, wherein an order of the Madras High Court refusing to issue certain directions to the Tamil Nadu State Election Commission is under challenge before us. It is also principal Opposition party in the Legislative Assembly of the State of Tamil Nadu and is a recognised State party.
Findings of Court:
Contention of the respondents that the present proceedings amount to “calling in question an election” and hence not being maintainable in view of the express constitutional embargos of Articles 243-O and 243-ZG does not impress us for the present proceedings are only to further the expeditious completion of prerequisites of a fair election.
Result : Appeals disposed of as infructuous.
JUDGMENT
These Interlocutory Applications have been filed seeking directions for compliance with the Constitutional mandate concerning elections to local bodies. The lead applicant, Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), is appellant in the Civil Appeal Nos. 54675469 of 2017, wherein an order of the Madras High Court refusing to issue certain directions to the Tamil Nadu State Election Commission (“State Election Commission”) is under challenge before us. It is also the principal Opposition party in the Legislative Assembly of the State of Tamil Nadu and is a recognised Stateparty.
2. In the Civil Appeal DMK claimed that the partyinpower at the State level, the AIADMK, has deliberately been postponing elections; unconstitutionally been altering constituencies and refusing to effect rotation with the object of gaining undue political advantage. They have claimed that Articles 243D and 243T mandated that delimitation of constituencies be conducted after every decadal census and concomitant reservations be effected for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes on a ‘rotation’ basis. In so far as the Tamil Nadu Panchayats (Second Amendment) Act, 2016 allowed the next cycle of local elections in Tamil Nadu to be conducted as per the earlier 2001 Census, it contravened Constitutional provisions and was thus liable to be struck down.
3. The aforestated issues have, however, been rendered academic by constitution of a Delimitation Commission under the newly enacted Tamil Nadu Delimitation Commission Act, 2017. This Commission initiated an elaborate exercise of delimitation on 25th July, 2017 and eventually formulated a draft ward delimitation proposal on 20th September, 2017. Thereafter, written objections were invited from the public, various political parties and organisations between 20th December, 2017 and 18th January, 2018. After considering such objections/suggestions and the revised proposals received from District Delimitation Authorities, the Delimitation Commission sent its final recommendation to the State Government on 31st August, 2018. Thereafter, a notification was issued by the State Government on 14th December, 2018 whereby the wards newly delimited per the 2011 Census figures were notified.
4. Thereafter, on 20th February, 2019 the Delimitation Commission forwarded proposals for reservation, whereupon post consideration, the State Government vide notifications dated 20th May, 2019, 21st May, 2019 and 24th May, 2019 notified reserved seats for rural and urban local bodies in the State.
5. It is noteworthy that soon after on 12th November, 2019 the State Government issued a notification dividing four existing districts of Tamil Nadu to create nine new districts. Vellore district was trifurcated into the districts of Vellore, Tirupathur and Ranipet; Kancheepuram was bifurcated into Kancheepuram and Chengalpet; Villupuram was bifurcated into Villupuram and Kallakurichi; and Tirunelveli was bifurcated into Tirunelveli and Tenkasi districts. Resultantly, some talukas were also restructured with certain revenue villages either being added or removed. Para 7 of the aforestated notification then reads as follows:
“7. The delimitation of the territorial wards of Village Panchayats, Panchayat Union and District Panchayats have already been notified under the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 (Tamil Nadu Act 21 of 1994) and thereby the delimitation exercise for the ensuing local body elections has already been completed. Notwithstanding the notification to bifurcate the Districts, the process started already to conduct the ensuing Local Body Elections will be continued as per the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 17.07.2019 in W.P. (C) No. 1267/2018. After the ensuing Local Body Elections, the process of modification, if any, with regard to local bodies will be taken up by the Government.”
6. As is apparent from the above ext
Election Commission of India v. Ashok Kumar and Others [2000 (8) SCC 216] – Applied [Para 14]
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.