IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 16.04.2026 Ravinder Kumar ...Petitioner(s)

Vs.

Om Parkash Vatta ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Ms. Eknoor Kaur Gill, Advocate for Mr. Pratap Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. S.P.Arora, Mr. Himanshu Arora, and Mr. Manpreet Singh, Advocates for the respondent.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Present Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the tenant against the concurrent judgments of the learned Courts below; whereby the Eviction Petition filed by the respondent/landlord has been allowed by both the Courts below.

2. Brief facts of the case in chronological order are as follows: -

19.11.2014 : On 19.11.2014, respondent/landlord had filed Eviction Petition (Annexure P-1), under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), seeking ejectment of petitioner from the demised premises on grounds of: (a) arrears of rent;

and (b) bonafide necessity.

15.05.2015: Petitioner had filed written statement dated 15.05.2015 (Annexure P-2), to the said Rent Petition.

28.07.2015: Respondent filed replication dated 28.07.2015 (Annexure P-3).

1