SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 83313

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
TANPREET SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 16.04.2026 Tanpreet Singh …..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present : Ms. Nandita Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 24.06.2025 (Annexure P-13), passed by respondent No.1, whereby the claim of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds on account of death of his father on 09.11.1999, has been rejected. Further, seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to re-consider the case of the petitioner for compassionate appointment.

2. Brief facts, as have been pleaded in the petition, are that the father of the petitioner, namely Sh. Baldev Ram, who was working as Art and Craft Teacher (Group ‘B’ Post) in the Education Department and was posted in Government High School, Village Kheri Jhameri, District Ludhiana, unfortunately passed away on 09.11.1999, while in service, leaving behind his widow and two children. At tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top