SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 3321

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Praveer Bhatnagar, J
BHAGIRATH SINGH (DECEASED) S/O SH. PREMA RAM – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13218/2016



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M.S. Raghav, Vishwas Saini, Mananjay Singh, Chetan Khandal
For the Respondents: Rakesh Choudhary, Siddhant Jain

A government servant discharged from service on grounds of invalidation is entitled to a pension under Rule 49(2) of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, even if they have not completed the minimum qualifying service of 10 years.

Headnote:The petitioner sought the release of disability pension under Rule 49(2) of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, following an invalidation of service on 20.10.1973 due to "Chronic Bronchities with airway obstruction." It was established that the petitioner was medically fit at the time of induction and the disability occurred during the course of employment. The court found that the petitioner was entitled to pensionary benefits despite not completing the standard qualifying service period. The central issue was whether a government servant discharged on grounds of invalidation is entitled to a pension even if they have not completed the qualifying service of 10 years. The court reasoned that under Rule 49(2) of the Rules of 1972, a person who has been discharged from services due to invalidation is entitled to the grant of pension regardless of the 10-year qualifying service requirement, relying on established judicial precedents. The writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's claim and release the pension within two months to the legal heirs of the deceased-petitioner.

Table of Content
1. background of the petitioner's service and medical discharge due to invalidation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. dispute over eligibility for pension without completing the 10-year qualifying service period. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. entitlement to pension upon invalidation regardless of qualifying service period under rule 49(2). (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. granting of pensionary benefits to the legal heirs of the deceased employee. (Para 13 , 14)

Judgment

1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-

“It is therefore humbly prayed that the respondents be directed to release the disability pension from the date of discharge to the petitioner, i.e. 20/10/1973, and the cost of litigation may be awarded in favour of the petitioner.”

2. During the course of litigation, the legal heirs of the deceased-petitioner Bhagirath were taken on record.

3. In a nutshell, the facts of the case are that the deceased-petitioner Bhagirath Singh was appointed as a Constable in the Gujarat Police on 01.09.1964 as a State Reserve Police Force, Gr. III. Before passing the Medical Fitness Examination, the petitioner undergone basic Police training at SRPF Godhra, and at the time of induction, the deceased-petitioner was not suffering from any disease/ailment. Thereafter, the deceased-petitioner was inducted into the CRPF on 01.04.1968, and on 20.10.1973, his services were invalidated. The deceased-petitioner has claimed the disability pension from the date of his discharge, as well as the cost of litigation.

4. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner’s services were invalidated on the report of the Medical Board, which opined that the petitioner was suffering from “Chronic Bronchities with airway obstruction” and unfit to serve in the Police Department.

5. It is contended that when the petitioner was inducted in the initial services, he was medically examined and found to be fit, the invalidation of the petitioner occurred during the course of his employment and petitioner is entitled to get the pension under Rule 49(2) of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules of 1972’).

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgment in the case of Union of India & Ors. Vs. P.A. Thomas [SLP (C) 20339/2011 dated 14.03.2019, whereby the Hon’ble Apex Court held as under:-

“2. In the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972-

(i) in rule 38, for sub-rule (1) and sub-rule (2), the following sub-rules shall respectively be substituted, namely:-

“(1) The case of a Government servant acquiring a disability, where the provisions of section 20 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 SLP (C) 20339/2011 (49 of 2016) are applicable, shall be governed by the provisions of the said section: Provided that such an employee shall produce a disability certificate from the competent authority as prescribed under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Rules, 2017.

(2) If a Government servant, in a case where the provisions of section 20 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (49 of 2016) are not applicable, retires from the service on account of any bodily or mental infirmity which permanently incapacitates him for the service, he may be granted invalid pension in accordance with rule 49:”

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner further places reliance upon the judgment of the Coordinate Bench passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3868/1994-Kharta Ram Vs. Union of India & Anr., wherein after placing reliance upon the judgment of Union of India & Ors. Vs. P.A. Thomas (supra), the Coordinate Bench allowed the writ petition, directing the respondents to release the pension.

8. Contrarily, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner is not entitled to the pension under Rule 49(2) of the Rules of 1972. He further submits that the petitioner has not completed the qualifying services of 10 years. It is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top