SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 3402

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
SANJEET PUROHIT
DHARAMPAL – Appellant
Versus
BEGRAJ – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 454/2026

1. Dharampal S/o Harsukh, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of Meghana Tehsil Nohar District Hanumangarh.

2. M/s Sawtri S/o Harsukh Joja, Aged About 68 Years, Resident Of Indu, Bhukarka Tehsil Nohar District, Hanumangarh.

3. Vimala S/o Harsukh Joja, Aged About 62 Years, Pratapkhamodia Tehsil And District Sirsa.

4. Shanti D/o Harsukh Jojabhagmal, Aged About 63 Years, Resident Of Kanau Tehsil Bhadra District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.

5. Kamala D/o Harsukh Joja Banwari, Aged About 71 Years, Resident Of Kanau Tehsil Bhadra District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.

----Petitioners Versus

1. Begraj S/o Manphool, Resident Of Kharsandi Tehsil Nohar District Hanumangarh.

2. Khyali Ram S/o Manphool, R/o

3. Sheonarayan S/o Manphool, R/o

4. Om Prakash S/o Manphool Sarva, Resident Of Kharsandi Tehsil Nohar District Hanumangarh.

5. Devi Lal S/o Udaram, R/o

6. Jai Singh S/o Ramlal Jat, R/o

7. Sukhmandra Singh S/o Bishan Singh, R/o

8. Hardev Singh S/o Vishansingh, 8, Md. Chando Bewa For Harsukh.

9. Md Chando W/o Lt. Harsukh, Meghana Tehsil Nohar District Hanumangarh.

Bhadra.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajendra Singh Mr. Nitesh Ra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top