Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANOOP KUMAR DHAND, J
Shwetabh Singhal – Appellant
Versus
J.k And Sons – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to admissibility of electronic evidence without proper section 65-b certification. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. need to determine the mandatory author of a section 65-b certificate for transferred electronic evidence. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. interpretation of section 65-b requiring certificate from the original device user. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. granting liberty to cure defects in electronic evidence certification. (Para 13 , 14) |
Order
1. By way of filing this writ petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 02.08.2025 passed by the Rent Tribunal, Jaipur Metropolitan-II (hereinafter referred as ‘the Tribunal’), by which the application submitted by the respondent No.2 under Section 21 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (for short, ‘the Act of 2001) has been allowed and the respondent has been permitted to produce electronic evidence contained under the Pen Drive and Compact Disc (CD) bearing exhibit Nos.8 to 44.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the certificate under Section 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act has been issued by the person in whose device the recording was transferred. Counsel submits that the original rec
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
