SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 11258

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL, BHUWAN GOYAL
RAM LAL AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


[2026:RJ-JP:13901-DB]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 234/1996

1. Ramlal son of Bhura aged 30 years

2. Ramdayal son of Lalaram aged 27 years Both Resident of Village Rampura P.S. Chaksu ----Appellants Versus State of Rajasthan ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Ms. Savita Nathawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL

Judgment

02/04/2026 (Per Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mahendar Kumar Goyal)

This Criminal Appeal is directed against the judgment dated

04.04.1996 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jaipur District, Jaipur (for brevity “the learned Trial Court”) in Sessions Case No.77/1992 whereby, while acquitting the accused-appellants (for short “the appellants”) of the charges under Sections 147, 452 and 302/149 IPC, they have been convicted and sentenced as under:-

Under Section 302 IPC: Rigorous life imprisonment and fine of ₹100/-; in default whereof, one month’s rigorous imprisonment.

Under Section 323 IPC: Fine of ₹500/-; in default whereof, three months’ simple imprisonment.

The relevant facts in brief are that on the Parcha Bayan (Ex.P10) of Laxmi Narain @ Pappu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top