B. R. GAVAI, SANDEEP MEHTA
Allarakha Habib Memon Etc. – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mehta, J.
1. Heard.
2. The instant criminal appeals have been filed by the appellants namely, Allarakha Habib Memon, Amin @ Lalo Aarifbhai Memon and Mohmedfaruk @ Palak Safibhai Memon, for assailing the common judgment dated 18th February, 2019, passed by the Division Bench of High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad dismissing the Criminal Appeal Nos. 94 of 2015, 450 of 2015 and 563 of 2015, preferred by the accused appellants and affirming the judgment and order dated 13th October, 2014 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Anand, in Sessions Case No. 84 of 2011(hereinafter being referred to as ‘trial Court’). The trial Court had convicted the appellants for offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860(hereinafter, referred to as ‘IPC’) and sentenced them to imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 1,000/- each, in default whereof, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months. At the same time, the appellants were acquitted of the charge for the offence punishable under Section 323 IPC.
Brief facts: -
3. The accused appellants are the residents of New Memon Colony, Bhalej Road, Anand. There was some issue rega
Tomaso Bruno & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Amrik Singh v. State of Punjab
Animireddy Venkata Ramana & Ors. v. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh
State of A.P. v. Punati Ramulu and Others
Babu Sahebagouda Rudragoudar and Others v. State of Karnataka
Murder – Sole circumstance of recovery of bloodstained weapon cannot form basis of conviction unless same was connected with murder of deceased by accused.
The burden of proof rests on the prosecution to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and contradictions in eyewitness testimonies may result in acquittal.
Discrepancies in eyewitness accounts undermined the prosecution's case, leading to the acquittal of the accused due to reasonable doubt of their involvement in the crime.
The court affirmed that all members of an unlawful assembly are liable for actions taken in support of their common objective, showcasing the interplay between direct and circumstantial evidence in e....
The prosecution must prove the charges against the accused beyond reasonable doubt, and unreliable witnesses, lack of a source of light, doubts about the place of occurrence, and lapses in the invest....
The conviction for murder was upheld based on eyewitness accounts and circumstantial evidence linking the appellants to the crime, affirming that minor inconsistencies in evidence do not undermine th....
Direct eyewitness testimony can establish guilt in murder cases, supported by physical evidence, where minor discrepancies do not diminish credibility.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.