IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Mukesh Kumar, S/o. Shri Mewaram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent
ORDER :
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant-applicant and learned State counsel on the second suspension of sentence application.
2. The applicant-appellant herein has been convicted for offences punishable under Sections 363, 366 & 344 of IPC and Section 5(l)/6 of POCSO Act vide judgment dated 04.08.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, Tonk (Rajasthan) in Sessions Case No.82/2020 and has been sentenced to maximum punishment of twenty years.
3. The first application for suspension of execution of sentence filed by the appellant-applicant was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 10.10.2024 while giving liberty to renew the prayer for suspension of sentence if appeal is not heard finally within a period of one year. Now, this second application for suspension of execution of sentence has been filed on behalf of the appellant-applicant.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant- applicant submits that appellant-applicant has wrongly been convicted by the learned trial Court. Counsel submits that learned trial Court has failed to appreciate the evidence available on record in correct perspective. It is submitted that
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.