Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
Ravi Chirania, J
Lokesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks appointment after selection, despite criminal pendency disclosure. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. probation act benefits and acquittal remove disqualification for public appointment. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. section 12 of probation act overrides departmental circulars regarding disqualification. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. reformation theory mandates reintegration of offenders into mainstream society. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 5. court directs appointment where criminal disqualification is statutorily removed. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
Judgment
Reportable
| 1. | Date of conclusion of Arguments | 15.04.2026 |
| 2. | Date on which the judgment was reserved | 15.04.2026 |
| 3. | Whether the full judgment or only operative part is pronounced | Full |
| 4. | Date of pronouncement | 19.05.2026 |
1. Petitioner Lokesh Kumar has filed the instant writ petition with the prayer that respondents be directed to give him appointment on the post of Constable in pursuance to the advertisement dated 29.10.2021, whereby more than 4,400 vacancies were advertised.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Gordhan Singh Fauzdar submitted that in pursuan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
