J U D G M E N T

SANJAY KAROL J.

Leave to Appeal is granted.

2. Questioned in these appeals are three judgements of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana passed in CR No. 4418 of 2012 (O & M) dated 6^th May 2015 and 16^th September 2015 along with RA-CR No. 265-CII of 2015 in CR No. 4418 of 2012, dated 20^th November 2015. The orders in civil revision (dated 6^th May and 16^th September 2015) were interim and final, respectively, dismissing such a revision against order and judgment dated 17^th January 2012 of the Additional District Judge, Moga, which allowed the appeal against the Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by JATINDERo KrAUdRer and judgment dated 17^th January 2009 of the Civil Judge, Junior Division Date: 2024.10.23 Reason:

who had allowed the objections taken by the Appellants herein in the execution petition filed to enforce the final decree in Civil Suit No. 266 of 1987.

BACKGROUND OF THE INSTANT DISPUTE

3. Although the bone of contention before this court relates to execution proceedings and the objections taken therein, the factual milieu in which the controversy has come to stand, as it does today, is important for the purpose of disposal of these appeals.

3.1 Civil Suit No.