ORDER

Delay condoned. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner – Sunita Pandey had inherited the property from her late father. She is entitled to deal with the said property. She submits that there is an oral partition/division. It is stated that proceedings have been initiated by the complainant/respondent no. 2 - brother Digitally signed by SWETA BALODI Date: 2024.01.05 17:58:38 IST Reason:

Signature Not Verified before the civil court. The property was sold before the injunction order was passed. However, the doctrine of lis pendens will apply. We have considered the impugned judgment/order as well as the contentions raised by the petitioner – Sunita Pandey before us. We are not inclined to issue notice in the present special leave petition. However, it will be open to the petitioner – Sunita Pandey to place the relevant documents on record including the document indicating the relationship between the petitioner and the complainant/respondent no.2. The trial court will independently examine all pleas and contentions raised by the petitioner as well as the prosecution/complainant. The petitioner – Sunita Sharm