SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 12220

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MAHESH DAMU KHARE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
SLP(Crl) No.-004326 - 2018



Long-term consensual relationships cannot be criminalized based on later disputes; consent must be voluntary and may be vitiated by misconception of fact.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 376, 420, 504, 506 - Quashing of FIR - High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 for quashing the FIR alleging rape and other offences, stating that the matter required further investigation and was an offence against society - The appellant contended that the relationship was consensual and the allegations were made after financial support was withdrawn. (Paras 2, 9, 10, 28, 34)

(B) Consent and Misconception of Fact - The court emphasized that consent must be voluntary and may be vitiated by misconception of fact, particularly concerning false promises of marriage - The court concluded that prolonged consensual relationships cannot be criminalized simply due to later disputes. (Paras 18, 20, 28, 30)

(C) Quashing of FIR - The court quashed the FIR, finding no prima facie case for the alleged offences, stating that allowing the proceedings would constitute an abuse of process. (Paras 36, 34)

Facts of the case:
The appellant, a social worker, was accused by the complainant of rape and other offences after a prolonged relationship, which the appellant claimed was consensual and based on mutual understanding. The complainant alleged that the appellant had exploited her under false promises of marriage.

Findings of Court:
The court found no prima facie evidence of rape or other offences as defined under the IPC, emphasizing the consensual nature of the relationship over the years.

Issues: The main issues were whether the relationship was consensual and if the allegations constituted a valid case for the alleged offences.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that long-term consensual relationships cannot be criminalized after they turn sour, and consent can be vitiated only under specific circumstances of deception or coercion.

Result: Appeal allowed; FIR quashed.

J U D G M E N T

NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH, J.

Leave granted.

2. The present appeal has been filed challenging the order dated

12.02.2018 passed by the Bombay High Court in Criminal Writ Petition (CRWP) No. 5190 of 2017 by which the High Court dismissed the petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short “CrPC”) by the present appellant seeking quashing of the FIR being CR No. 302 of 2017 dated 15.08.2017 filed by the complainant (Respondent no. 2 herein) registered with Kharghar Police Station, Navi Mumbai for offences punishable under Sections 376 , 420 , 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by RADHA SHARMA Code, 1860 (in short “ IPC ”) holding, inter alia, that the offence Date: 2024.11.26

16:52:35 IST Reason:

under Section 376 of IPC is an offence against the society which would require further investigation into the matter and does not warrant interference.

3. The brief facts leading to the filing of the said Writ Petition as culled from the records may be stated as follows:

3.1 The appellant claims to be a social worker since 1985 and is engaged in various socio-political activities, who provides help and assistance to the needy whenever sought. It was contended that in 2012 the appellant was approached by the complainant (Respondent no. 2) seeking help in resolving the issue of kidnapping of her elder daughter which he successfully accomplished. Thereafter, the complainant started visiting the office of the appellant and was regularly assisting in the socio- political works of the appellant. The appellant also on her request used to extend financial help for support and education of the children of the complainant. The complainant, however, continued to seek more financial assistance from the appellant which he could not afford any longer and accordingly, helped her to find employment.

3.2 It is the case of the appellant that the complainant continued to seek more attention and financial help from the appellant, because of which the appellant tried to ignore her, to which she became aggressive and started issuing threats not only to the appellant but also to his family members to extort more money from the appellant which led to filing of several complaints against the complainant (Respondent no. 2) by the wife of the appellant. In all, five complaints were lodged with Nerul Police Station by the appellant, his wife and his office staff against the harassment tactics of the complainant for extorting money from the appellant. However, the complainant continued her aggressive, abusive behaviour towards the appellant and family members.

4. The appellant, to his shock, learnt later that a complaint was filed by Respondent no. 2 as a counter blast which was registered as FIR No. 302 of 2017 dated 15.08.2017 under Sections 376 , 420 , 504 and 506 of the IPC stating, inter alia, as follows:-

(i) The complainant was married in 1994 by performing Christian rituals out of which two daughters were born. Her husband died in the year 2003. Thereafter, she came to reside at Sarsole in Navi Mumbai and was looking for a job as she had no means of livelihood. While looking for a job she was introduced to the appellant who was also in need of a helper to look after his ailing wife.

(ii) Accordingly, she met the appellant in 2008. The appellant told the complainant that his wife had skin disease, thyroid problem and paralytic stroke and the complainant has to look after his wife at his own residence at Kharghar Sector 12, behind HDFC ATM.

(iii) Accordingly, on the next day in the morning she went to the house of the appellant along with her daughter. It was alleged that the appellant was with his second wife Kalpana at home and the wife asked her daughter to sit with her and sent the complainant to the bedroom to massage the feet of the appellant and while massaging the appellant citing reasons of illness of both his wives, told her that he would marry her and thereafter, had s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top