SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9864

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Mehta, J
LAKHA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
BALWINDER SINGH & ANR. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Ankit Goel
For the Respondents: Not mentioned

Table of Content
1. court granted leave to appeal. (Para 1 , 2)
2. background and specifics of the trial case. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court found the agreement was fraudulent. (Para 12 , 33 , 36)
4. supreme court allowed the appeal, reversing previous judgments. (Para 39 , 40)

JUDGMENT

1. Heard.

3. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment dated 25th April, 2018 rendered by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, whereby the second appeal1 , RSA No. 4577 of 2017(O&M). preferred by the appellant-defendant was dismissed, and the judgment dated 20th March, 2017 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Tarn Taran2 , ‘First Appellate Court’. in Civil Appeal3 Civil Appeal No. 05 of 2016. was affirmed. The First Appellate Court dismissed the Civil Appeal preferred by the appellant- defendant and upheld the judgment and decree dated 18th February, 2013 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Patti, Tarn Taran4 ‘trial Court’. in Civil Suit5 Civil Suit No. 535 of 2008. filed by the respondent-plaintiff. The trial Court allowed the suit partly, directing the recovery of Rs. 16,00,000/- and the interest accrued thereupon from the appell

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top